- Hillary Clinton: "He should not have the nuclear codes because it’s very easy to imagine Donald Trump leading us into a war just because someone got under his very thin skin.''
- Noam Chomsky on Trump: "Almost a death knell for the human species."
Both Clinton and Chomsky take it as read that the election of Trump and subsequent annihilation of the human race would be a sub-optimal outcome. Neither bothers to explain why this is the case; they just assume their audiences share their prejudices. No doubt Clinton's strategists have calculated that human extinction doesn't poll well in swing states.
Yet for a polar bear or a sea cucumber, fewer humans might be just what the doctor ordered. Two hundred years from now the planet will probably be in pretty good shape, if Trump delivers on his pledge to wipe out our odious rat-like species. That's another thing I don't like about Clinton- she's so homo-centric. Just because she isn't a sea cucumber, she acts as though no one is.
The latest polls show that only 0.2% of Americans would welcome a nuclear confrontation with China. But 0.2% is equivalent to the population of El Paso, Texas. What gives Clinton the right to single out El Paso in this way? I can't tell you how angry this makes me.
I think Trump's policies make a lot of sense, but I'm completely high right now.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий