Показаны сообщения с ярлыком SEO Cornwall. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком SEO Cornwall. Показать все сообщения

четверг, 15 июня 2017 г.

Cornwall digital marketing lagging behind rest of country

Truro digital marketing


Having taken more interest in the digital marketing of local, Cornish online retailers, I am shocked at the lack of optimisation of the websites representing Cornish businesses.


Often it is simple things like a lack of keyword research, or the wrong kind of content on a website, or simple incorrect technical SEO.


I don’t think it’s just about money as a lot of these issues can be resolved by the owners and those people who run the websites, and perhaps businesscornwall.co.uk could look at this more closely.211111111


Cornwall has one of the lowest rates of digital activity among local retailers and shoppers in England, according to new statistics.


According to The UK Digital Influence Index, which calculates the digital output of a town or city based on the social media activity of its retailers and consumers, the county has an average ranking of 753.


The index measures the digital influence of over 1,300 towns and cities across the UK daily. ‘Digital influence’ is the ability of any town or city to drive measurable outcomes from online channels to their high street.


Cornwall’s highest ranked location was Penzance at 89, followed by Truro at 180. St. Agnes was the lowest at 1170.


To increase their digital influence – and footfall – shoppers and retailers in towns and cities across the UK are joining #WDYT (What Do You Think), a collaborative campaign which works to connect retailers and consumers digitally, with the aim of converting this into increased footfall.


People are asked to share a photo each day of their favourite item of stock or something they love when out shopping to share across their social media channels, using #[Town], i.e #Penzance and #WDYT. In the same post/tweet they are also asked to tag in the relevant retailer’s social account handle. By doing this shoppers then have an opportunity to win their favourite thing.


Polly Barnfield OBE, CEO and Founder of Maybe* which runs #WDYT, said: “With the increasing culture of online shopping, reviews and research, retail is now a 24/7 experience. The use of digital channels influences 78% of purchase decisions. Embracing these channels can reap significant benefits for both individual retailers and their combined towns and cities.”


The campaign launched in Gloucestershire in 2016 and has helped the county rise quickly up the rankings, with both Cheltenham and Gloucester now ranked in the top 20 towns and cities in the country.


Since February 2017, the campaign has also gone live in another seven towns and cities throughout the country. The data collected is being linked with local footfall devices to reveal the impact of digital influence on local footfall.


A further 15 towns and cities are also in discussions to go live, prior to a nationwide roll-out later this year.


Diane Savory, OBE DL, Chair of GFirst LEP, said: “In becoming digitally savvy, local businesses can join forces to drive footfall into towns and cities, dynamically changing our local economies.


“The rate of change for businesses in the digital world is accelerating rapidly which means we must adapt. We have pioneered a blueprint in Gloucestershire that others can adopt. All UK towns and cities need to embrace the increasingly digitally connected consumer.”


Polly added: “The pilot campaign was a huge success, engaging with over 200 retailers and over 50,000 consumers all using #WDYT – we are here to help all retailers across the UK drive local footfall through digital channels.”


To get involved with #WDYT both business owners and their customers can simply post pictures to Twitter or Instagram using #Town (i.e #Penzance) and #WDYT and, where possible, @mention the local business too.


The UK Digital Influence Index is available for all 1300 UK towns. To see where your town or city ranks and for more information about the #WDYT campaign, see www.wdyt.org.uk


The post Cornwall digital marketing lagging behind rest of country appeared first on Digital marketing blog Cornwall seo.


пятница, 21 апреля 2017 г.

SEO Audit of UK Conservative and Labour Party websites

uk general election seo audit


Websites are tools of communication and persuasion. And as such should be used correctly by political parties to achieve their aims. Following best practice web design and SEO it is relatively simple to create a website that Google will love, which increases your chances of ranking higher in the search engine results pages.


Performing an SEO audit on a website is required to establish whether or not a website is following best practice and is optimised in the most effective and efficient way.


It does take a lot of time and effort to do a full audit, but I thought I would show a few examples of what an audit can pick up. As the UK general election is in full swing I thought it would be interesting to look at the two main political parties.


Due to the amount of time a full audit would have taken, we have only been able to do a partial audit and focus on a few important things


Disclaimer: I have no allegiance to any political party, am a swing voter and have approached the analysis of both websites with a completely open mind.


conservatives.com


H1 Tag


No H1 tag exists.

Not good, Google values a H1 tag, I would suggest an H1 tag which echoed the title tag. As it would seem that is the most important keyword for the site


Although there are H2 and H3 tags


Share The Facts



Why we need a general election


Missing a H1 tag is not best practice, and is an opportunity missed to highlight a specific keyword to Google that the page finds important.

</span>The Conservative Party<span class="html-tag">

Functional and showing what is important, but missing an opportunity to add a slogan which will be seen by many. Missing an opportunity for further communication as the title tag is listed in the search engine results pages and does get scanned. A slogan is perfect for that context.


Meta Description


name=”Descriptioncontent=”The Conservative Party – Building a country that works for everyone” />


Again, very functional, very conservative. A phrase that is all about getting on with the job with little fuss. I think this works for the Conservative brand.


Canocilization


Although tricky to say, canocilization is a technical issue with the URL structure, it should follow a logical and hierachical structure, allowing Google to easily decide which of your pages you have deemed the most important.


It is crucial you are able to tell Google which is the front page to your website, as that is the one it will want to rank.


You must only have one of the following that will show in your browser, if not Google may index the duplicate URL and it will weaken your ranking potential.



  • http://yourdomain.com

  • http://www.yourdomain.com

  • https://yourdomain.com

  • https://www.yourdomain.com


The Conservative website has correct canocilization,  is correct, as only https://www.conservatives.com is available.


Duplicate content errors

Pages within the folder, “http://press.conservatives.com/archive/” are throwing up duplicate content errors. Possibly these pages should be non-indexed if not needed to rank or the con. This allows Google to know the exact pages needed to rank. Whilst not a major issue, optimising this will make the site more easier for Google to index the correct pages.


Oh, and something interesting popped up. The meta keywords tag is now redundant and yet the Conservative website has, name=”Keywordscontent=”conservatives, conservative, conservative party, tories, tory, david cameron, centre-right” />


Did you spot the error?


 


labour.org.uk


H1 tag


Very bad situation with regards to the Labour parties H1 tags.


Labour



style=”margin-bottom: 0.6em;“>We will build a better, fairer Britain.



JEREMY CORBYN’S 10 PLEDGES TO TRANSFORM BRITAIN



Labour




You only ever have one H1 tag, whilst you can have many H2 and h3 tags.

It is how Google knows to structure what is important on the page.

A website is a communication and persuasion tool, it should be constructed along best practice guidelines. It’s actually very simple and logical to do this and getting the H1 tag this wrong is inexcusable.


To a web designer or SEO this is quite shocking as the error is not a simple mistake as it is repeated a number of times. Leading me to question the methodology of those who put this website together.


My questions to the Labour party if they were a client would be:



  • Who is responsible for the oversight of the website?

  • Did the web designer who put this page together raise the bad practice issues?

  • What processes are in place to catch such simple mistakes?


I wouldn’t lay the blame at the person who was tasked to do the actual coding, but would investigate the management and systems that allowed this to happen. As whomever is in charge is doing a very bad job.


Title tag


</span>We are Labour – The Labour Party<span class="html-tag">


Not quite sure of the purpose of the duplication. “The Labour party – insert slogan here“, would be better. Seems redundant and a waste of a call to action opportunity.


Meta Description


name=”descriptioncontent=”We are a people-powered movement. Be part of it.“>


This tells me that the “movement”, is a movement and not a party, is powered by people. Not sure what else a “movement” would be powered by. “Be part of it”, not sure if this is telling me what to do or asking me. It certainly does not inspire a click through if seen in the search engine results page, which is the purpose of the meta description.


Canocilization


This is a complete mess.


https://www.labour.org.uk/index.php/home/

http://www.labour.org.uk/index.php/home/


Are both available to the browser.

Yes that is correct, the Labour party website does not yet have a https certificate, which enables data to be encrypted between the browser and the website. It is best practice to have one and Google is saying you should have one and Google uses it as a ranking signal. This is again a basic error which any beginner web designer or SEO would know.


Also, the front page now redirects to http://www.labour.org.uk/index.php/home/splash, which means there are now 3 front pages. It is important you only have one front page to present to Google as it has to chose which one it is going to rank.


The request for contact details would have been better as being above the fold on the original front page and still have the same URL structure. Still filling the screen, but without messing with the structure of the website and its optimisation.


A quick fix would be to redirect the https page to the http page, as well as to redirect http://www.labour.org.uk/index.php/home/ to http://www.labour.org.uk and get rid of the splash page.


But the best solution is to get a https certificate and then redirect all front pages to https://www.labour.org.uk


Other UK political parties are:


libdems.org.uk


snp.org


ukip.org


greenparty.org.uk


plaid.cymru


mebyonkernow.org


More information on what is important best practice:

Search Engine Optimization Starter Guide from Google, this is a great starting guide from the people who you really should be listening to.


The post SEO Audit of UK Conservative and Labour Party websites appeared first on Digital marketing blog Cornwall seo.